33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives of your police is to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, guarantee law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair into the offender as well as Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other Courts, Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Little fees implement.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the uncovered counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession in the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this component for interim custody of the topic premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
The loads of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it can be made apparent that police is free to choose action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities subject to law. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. If the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and they shall be assigned non-subject duties from the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This is because transfer orders are typically viewed as within the administrative discretion of the employer. However, there could be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more
Though there isn't any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds very little sway. Still, if there is no precedent in the home state, relevant case regulation from another state can be regarded by the court.
When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, though it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it can be actually quite imprecise about whether the ninety-day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based within the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held towards the ninety-day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents of your boy or Lady do not approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they are able to do if they will Slash off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that is a major, the pair is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who gives these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by regulation.
ten. Without touching the merits of your case in the issue of once-a-year increases in the pensionary emoluments in the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of your provincial government, this kind of annual increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment to generally be made through the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance on account of funding issues and deficiency of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons obtaining their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to accomplish absent with the candidature on the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
For that reason, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated earlier mentioned. However no harassment shall be caused to both party along with the case shall be decided from the competent court of legislation if pending. Read more
Summaries of cases that shape the lives of younger individuals, guaranteeing a deeper understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and enthusiasts alike.
Normally, only an appeal accepted from the court of past vacation resort will resolve this sort of differences and, For a lot of reasons, such appeals will often be not granted.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is additionally a perfectly-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject for the procedure hostile witness case law provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.